Re-defining a high volume center for pancreaticoduodenectomy

• Published in: HPB (Oxford, England) Vol. 23; no. 5; pp. 733 - 738
• Main Authors: Panni, Roheena Z., Panni, Usman Y., Liu, Jingxia, Williams, Gregory A., Fields, Ryan C., Sanford, Dominic E., Hawkins, William G., Hammill, Chet W.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2021
• Subjects: Anastomosis, Surgical; Databases, Factual; Hospital Mortality; Hospitals, High-Volume; Humans; Logistic Models; Pancreatectomy; Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects
• ISSN: 1365-182X; 1477-2574
• DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.09.009

The purpose of this study was to re-evaluate the previously utilized definitions of high volume center for pancreaticoduodenectomy to determine/establish an objective, evidence based threshold of hospital volume associated with improvement in perioperative mortality. Patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy were identified using the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015. The relationship between hospital volume and 90-day mortality was assessed using a logistic regression model. Receiver Operator Characteristic analysis was performed and Youden's statistic was utilized to calculate the optimal cut offs. 42,402 patients underwent elective Pancreaticoduodenectomy at 1238 unique hospitals. A logistic regression was performed which showed a significant inverse linear association between institutional volume and overall 90 day mortality. The maximum improvement in 90 day mortality is seen if the average annual hospital volume was greater than 9 (OR = 0.647 (0.595–0.702), p < 0.0001). When analysis is limited to hospitals that performed >9 cases per year, the maximum improvement in 90 day mortality was noticed at 36 cases per year (OR = 0.458 (0.399–0.525), p < 0.0001). Based on our results, we recommend defining low, medium, and high volume centers for pancreaticoduodenectomy as hospitals with average annual volume less than 9, 9 to 35, and more than 35 cases per year, respectively.