Role of Clofazimine in Treatment of Mycobacterium avium Complex

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), specifically complex (MAC), is an increasingly prevalent cause of pulmonary dysfunction. Clofazimine has been shown to be effective for the treatment of complex, but there were no published large-scale analyses comparing clofazimine to non-clofazimine regimens in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in medicine Vol. 8; p. 638306
Main Authors Nasiri, Mohammad Javad, Calcagno, Tess, Hosseini, Sareh Sadat, Hematian, Ali, Nojookambari, Neda Yousefi, Karimi-Yazdi, Mohammadmahdi, Mirsaeidi, Mehdi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 15.04.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), specifically complex (MAC), is an increasingly prevalent cause of pulmonary dysfunction. Clofazimine has been shown to be effective for the treatment of complex, but there were no published large-scale analyses comparing clofazimine to non-clofazimine regimens in MAC treatment. The objective of this large-scale meta-analysis was to evaluate patient characteristics and treatment outcomes of individuals diagnosed with MAC and treated with a clofazimine-based regimen. We used Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to search for studies published from January 1, 1990 to February 9, 2020. Two reviewers (SSH and NY) extracted the data from all eligible studies and differences were resolved by consensus. Statistical analyses were performed with STATA (version 14, IC; Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). The pooled success treatment rate with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was assessed using random effect model. The estimated pooled treatment success rates were 56.8% in clofazimine and 67.9% in non-clofazimine groups. Notably, success rates were higher (58.7%) in treatment of HIV patients with disseminated infection. Treatment was more successful in the non-clofazimine group overall. However, HIV patients with disseminated infection had higher treatment response rates than non-HIV patients within the clofazimine group.
Bibliography:content type line 23
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
Edited by: Marwan Osman, Lebanese University, Lebanon
This article was submitted to Infectious Diseases - Surveillance, Prevention and Treatment, a section of the journal Frontiers in Medicine
Reviewed by: Jun Chen, Fudan University, China; Fouad Ahmad Dabboussi, Lebanese University, Lebanon
ISSN:2296-858X
2296-858X
DOI:10.3389/fmed.2021.638306