Surrogate utility estimation by long-term partners and unfamiliar dyads

To what extent are people able to make predictions about other people's preferences and values?We report two experiments that present a novel method assessing some of the basic processes in surrogate decision-making, namely surrogate-utility estimation. In each experiment participants formed dy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 6; p. 315
Main Authors Tunney, Richard J, Ziegler, Fenja V
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 25.03.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To what extent are people able to make predictions about other people's preferences and values?We report two experiments that present a novel method assessing some of the basic processes in surrogate decision-making, namely surrogate-utility estimation. In each experiment participants formed dyads who were asked to assign utilities to health related items and commodity items, and to predict their partner's utility judgments for the same items. In experiment one we showed that older adults in long-term relationships were able to accurately predict their partner's wishes. In experiment two we showed that younger adults who were relatively unfamiliar with one another were also able to predict other people's wishes. Crucially we demonstrated that these judgments were accurate even after partialling out each participant's own preferences indicating that in order to make surrogate utility estimations people engage in perspective-taking rather than simple anchoring and adjustment, suggesting that utility estimation is not the cause of inaccuracy in surrogate decision-making. The data and implications are discussed with respect to theories of surrogate decision-making.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Sina Radke, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Germany; Dafina Petrova, University of Granada, Spain; Diana Ivanova Bakalova, Institute for Population and Human Studies - Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria
This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Edited by: Petko Kusev, Kingston University London, UK
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00315