Anatomical Parameters of tDCS to Modulate the Motor System after Stroke: A Review
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation method to modulate the local field potential in neural tissue and consequently, cortical excitability. As tDCS is relatively portable, affordable, and accessible, the applications of tDCS to probe brain-behavior conne...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in neurology Vol. 8; p. 29 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Frontiers Media S.A
09.02.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation method to modulate the local field potential in neural tissue and consequently, cortical excitability. As tDCS is relatively portable, affordable, and accessible, the applications of tDCS to probe brain-behavior connections have rapidly increased in the last 10 years. One of the most promising applications is the use of tDCS to modulate excitability in the motor cortex after stroke and promote motor recovery. However, the results of clinical studies implementing tDCS to modulate motor excitability have been highly variable, with some studies demonstrating that as many as 50% or more of patients fail to show a response to stimulation. Much effort has therefore been dedicated to understand the sources of variability affecting tDCS efficacy. Possible suspects include the placement of the electrodes, task parameters during stimulation, dosing (current amplitude, duration of stimulation, frequency of stimulation), individual states (e.g., anxiety, motivation, attention), and more. In this review, we first briefly review potential sources of variability specific to stroke motor recovery following tDCS. We then examine how the anatomical variability in tDCS placement [e.g., neural target(s) and montages employed] may alter the neuromodulatory effects that tDCS exerts on the post-stroke motor system. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 Specialty section: This article was submitted to Movement Disorders, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology Edited by: Mary Ellen Stoykov, Rush University, USA Reviewed by: Mariella Pazzaglia, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Heidi M. Schambra, New York University, USA; Amit Sethi, University of Pittsburgh, USA |
ISSN: | 1664-2295 1664-2295 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fneur.2017.00029 |