A Tutorial Review of Functional Connectivity Analysis Methods and Their Interpretational Pitfalls

Oscillatory neuronal activity may provide a mechanism for dynamic network coordination. Rhythmic neuronal interactions can be quantified using multiple metrics, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. This tutorial will review and summarize current analysis methods used in the field of inv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in systems neuroscience Vol. 9; p. 175
Main Authors Bastos, André M., Schoffelen, Jan-Mathijs
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 08.01.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1662-5137
1662-5137
DOI10.3389/fnsys.2015.00175

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Oscillatory neuronal activity may provide a mechanism for dynamic network coordination. Rhythmic neuronal interactions can be quantified using multiple metrics, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. This tutorial will review and summarize current analysis methods used in the field of invasive and non-invasive electrophysiology to study the dynamic connections between neuronal populations. First, we review metrics for functional connectivity, including coherence, phase synchronization, phase-slope index, and Granger causality, with the specific aim to provide an intuition for how these metrics work, as well as their quantitative definition. Next, we highlight a number of interpretational caveats and common pitfalls that can arise when performing functional connectivity analysis, including the common reference problem, the signal to noise ratio problem, the volume conduction problem, the common input problem, and the sample size bias problem. These pitfalls will be illustrated by presenting a set of MATLAB-scripts, which can be executed by the reader to simulate each of these potential problems. We discuss how these issues can be addressed using current methods.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
Edited by: Mikhail Lebedev, Duke University, USA
Reviewed by: Karim Jerbi, University of Montreal, Canada; Mingzhou Ding, University of Florida, USA; Craig Geoffrey Richter, Ernst Strüngmann Institute, Germany
ISSN:1662-5137
1662-5137
DOI:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00175