Can Post-Error Dynamics Explain Sequential Reaction Time Patterns?

We investigate human error dynamics in sequential two-alternative choice tasks. When subjects repeatedly discriminate between two stimuli, their error rates and reaction times (RTs) systematically depend on prior sequences of stimuli. We analyze these sequential effects on RTs, separating error and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 3; p. 213
Main Authors Goldfarb, Stephanie, Wong-Lin, KongFatt, Schwemmer, Michael, Leonard, Naomi Ehrich, Holmes, Philip
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 01.01.2012
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We investigate human error dynamics in sequential two-alternative choice tasks. When subjects repeatedly discriminate between two stimuli, their error rates and reaction times (RTs) systematically depend on prior sequences of stimuli. We analyze these sequential effects on RTs, separating error and correct responses, and identify a sequential RT tradeoff: a sequence of stimuli which yields a relatively fast RT on error trials will produce a relatively slow RT on correct trials and vice versa. We reanalyze previous data and acquire and analyze new data in a choice task with stimulus sequences generated by a first-order Markov process having unequal probabilities of repetitions and alternations. We then show that relationships among these stimulus sequences and the corresponding RTs for correct trials, error trials, and averaged over all trials are significantly influenced by the probability of alternations; these relationships have not been captured by previous models. Finally, we show that simple, sequential updates to the initial condition and thresholds of a pure drift diffusion model can account for the trends in RT for correct and error trials. Our results suggest that error-based parameter adjustments are critical to modeling sequential effects.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Eddy J. Davelaar, Birkbeck College, UK; Don Van Ravenzwaaij, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
This article was submitted to Frontiers in Cognitive Science, a specialty of Frontiers in Psychology.
Edited by: Marius Usher, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00213