Reliability of the diaphragmatic compound muscle action potential evoked by cervical magnetic stimulation and recorded via chest wall surface EMG

•Diaphragm CMAPs may be reliably evoked within and across testing sessions conducted on different days.•Cervical magnetic stimulation combined with chest wall surface EMG provides an effective means of evaluating phrenic nerve conduction in healthy young subjects.•Maximal phrenic nerve stimulation c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRespiratory physiology & neurobiology Vol. 243; pp. 101 - 106
Main Authors Welch, Joseph F., Mildren, Robyn L., Zaback, Martin, Archiza, Bruno, Allen, Grayson P., Sheel, A.William
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.09.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1569-9048
1878-1519
1878-1519
DOI10.1016/j.resp.2017.05.011

Cover

More Information
Summary:•Diaphragm CMAPs may be reliably evoked within and across testing sessions conducted on different days.•Cervical magnetic stimulation combined with chest wall surface EMG provides an effective means of evaluating phrenic nerve conduction in healthy young subjects.•Maximal phrenic nerve stimulation can be achieved in the majority of subjects using cervical magnetic stimulation. Stimulation of the phrenic nerve via cervical magnetic stimulation (CMS) elicits a compound muscle action potential (CMAP) that allows for assessment of diaphragm activation. The reliability of CMS to evoke the CMAP recorded by chest wall surface EMG has yet to be comprehensively examined. CMS was performed on healthy young males (n=10) and females (n=10). Surface EMG electrodes were placed on the right and left hemi-diaphragm between the 6–8th intercostal spaces. CMAPs were analysed for: latency, duration, peak-to-peak amplitude, and area. Reliability within and between experimental sessions was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Bilateral (right-left) and sex-based (male-female) comparisons were also made (independent samples t-test). All CMAP characteristics demonstrated high reproducibility within (ICCs>0.96) and between (ICCs>0.89) experimental sessions. No statistically significant bilateral or sex-based differences were found (p>0.05). CMS is a reliable and non-invasive method to evaluate phrenic nerve conduction.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1569-9048
1878-1519
1878-1519
DOI:10.1016/j.resp.2017.05.011