Models Predicting Psychosis in Patients With High Clinical Risk: A Systematic Review

• Published in: Frontiers in psychiatry Vol. 11; p. 223
• Main Authors: Montemagni, Cristiana, Bellino, Silvio, Bracale, Nadja, Bozzatello, Paola, Rocca, Paola
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 24.03.2020
• Subjects: attenuated psychotic symptoms (APS); brief and limited intermittent psychotic symptoms (BLIPS); clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR); genetic risk and deterioration syndrome (GRD); predictive model; Psychiatry; brief and limited intermittent psychotic symptoms (BLIPS); predictive model; attenuated psychotic symptoms (APS); genetic risk and deterioration syndrome (GRD); clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR)
• ISSN: 1664-0640; 1664-0640
• DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00223

The present study reviews predictive models used to improve prediction of psychosis onset in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR), using clinical, biological, neurocognitive, environmental, and combinations of predictors. A systematic literature search on PubMed was carried out (from 1998 through 2019) to find all studies that developed or validated a model predicting the transition to psychosis in CHR subjects. We found 1,406 records. Thirty-eight of them met the inclusion criteria; 11 studies using clinical predictive models, seven studies using biological models, five studies using neurocognitive models, five studies using environmental models, and 18 studies using combinations of predictive models across different domains. While the highest positive predictive value (PPV) in clinical, biological, neurocognitive, and combined predictive models were relatively high (all above 83), the highest PPV across environmental predictive models was modest (63%). Moreover, none of the combined models showed a superiority when compared with more parsimonious models (using only neurocognitive, clinical, biological, or environmental factors). The use of predictive models may allow high prognostic accuracy for psychosis prediction in CHR individuals. However, only ten studies had performed an internal validation of their models. Among the models with the highest PPVs, only the biological and neurocognitive but not the combined models underwent validation. Further validation of predicted models is needed to ensure external validity.