Negative effects of ant foraging on spiders in Douglas-fir canopies

• Published in: Oecologia Vol. 109; no. 2; pp. 313 - 322
• Main Authors: Halaj, J, Ross, D.W, Moldenke, A.R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin Springer-Verlag 01.01.1997; Springer
• Subjects: Animal and plant ecology; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Ants; Arthropods; Biological and medical sciences; Community Ecology; coniferous forests; Ecological competition; Foraging; Forest canopy; Formicidae; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Hunting; Insect behavior; Leaves; predator-prey relationships; Predators; Pseudotsuga menziesii; species diversity; Spiders; Synecology; Terrestrial ecosystems; Oregon; United States; North America; America; Formicidae; Insecta; Araneida; Population structure; Guild; Formicoidea; Pseudotsuga menziesii; Arachnida; Artificial forest stand; Animal community; Arthropoda; Softwood forest tree; Gymnospermae; Interspecific competition; Coniferales; Spermatophyta; Predation; Hymenoptera; Invertebrata; Aculeata; Ecological abundance; Canopy(vegetation); Psocoptera; Key words Competition; Douglas-fir canopy; Ants; Spiders
• ISSN: 0029-8549; 1432-1939
• DOI: 10.1007/s004420050089

Spiders and ants are potential competitors and mutual predators. Indirect evidence from previous research has suggested that ant foraging may significantly lower the abundance of arboreal spiders in young Douglas-fir plantations in western Oregon. This study tested the effect of foraging by ants, dominated by Camponotus spp., on spider assemblages in Douglas-fir canopies in a 5-month ant-exclusion experiment. The biomass of potential prey organisms on foliage, dominated by Psocoptera, increased significantly by 1.9- to 2.4-fold following ant exclusion. The removal of ants did not affect the abundance of flying arthropods in the vicinity of tree canopies as indicated by sticky trap catches. The abundance of hunting spiders, the majority being Salticidae, increased significantly by 1.5- to 1.8-fold in trees without ants in the late summer; neither the abundance of web-building spiders nor the average body size of hunting and web-building spiders were significantly affected by ant removal. Spider diversity and community structure did not differ significantly between control and ant-removal trees. The majority of prey captured by ants were Aphidoidea (48.1%) and Psocoptera (12.5%); spiders represented only 1.4% of the ants' diet. About 40% of observed ants were tending Cinara spp. aphids. Our observations suggest that the lower abundance of hunting spiders in control canopies with ants may be due to interference competition with ants resulting from ant foraging and aphid-tending activities. Direct predation of spiders by ants appeared to be of minor importance in this study system. This study did not provide sufficient evidence for exploitative competition for prey between ants and spiders.