Domains of Everyday Creativity and Personal Values

We examined the applicability of the hybrid model of creativity, which specifies distinct domains that all express an underlying general creativity factor, in data from representative samples from Central Russia and the North Caucasus ( = 2,046). Using multigroup confirmatory analysis, Study 1 suppo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 9; p. 2681
Main Authors Lebedeva, Nadezdha, Schwartz, Shalom H, Van De Vijver, Fons J R, Plucker, Jonathan, Bushina, Ekaterina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 14.01.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We examined the applicability of the hybrid model of creativity, which specifies distinct domains that all express an underlying general creativity factor, in data from representative samples from Central Russia and the North Caucasus ( = 2,046). Using multigroup confirmatory analysis, Study 1 supported the invariance of a model with the six unifactorial domains (i.e., crafts, visual arts, performance, theater, products for work, and machine graphics) at the first level and a general creativity factor at the second level. Study 2 examined socio-demographic characteristics and 19 basic values that might be associated with creative activity. The more modern Central Russian region scored higher on global creativity and on all 6 domains. Of the 4 higher order values in the Schwartz model, Openness to Change values correlated positively and Conservation values correlated negatively with global creativity and with creativity in most domains. Variation across domains in the specific values that predicted creativity revealed that creativity in each domain had some unique motivators. We draw on culture and social structure to explain differences between regions in the value motivators of creativity.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Cultural Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Reviewed by: Yanjun Guan, Durham University, United Kingdom; Fang Fang Chen, University of Delaware, United States
Edited by: Xiaopeng Ren, Institute of Psychology (CAS), China
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02681