Development and Validation of a Clinical Prognostic Nomogram for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Patients

Clinical staging is essential for clinical decisions but remains imprecise. We purposed to construct a novel survival prediction model for improving clinical staging system (cTNM) for patients with esophageal adenocarcioma (EAC). A total of 4180 patients diagnosed with EAC were extracted from the Su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in oncology Vol. 11; p. 736573
Main Authors Shao, Chen-Ye, Yu, Yue, Li, Qi-Fan, Liu, Xiao-Long, Song, Hai-Zhu, Shen, Yi, Yi, Jun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 02.09.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Clinical staging is essential for clinical decisions but remains imprecise. We purposed to construct a novel survival prediction model for improving clinical staging system (cTNM) for patients with esophageal adenocarcioma (EAC). A total of 4180 patients diagnosed with EAC were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and included as the training cohort. Significant prognostic variables were identified for nomogram model development using multivariable Cox regression. The model was validated internally by bootstrap resampling, and then subjected to external validation with a separate cohort of 886 patients from 2 institutions in China. The prognostic performance was measured by concordance index (C-index), Akaike information criterion (AIC) and calibration plots. Different risk groups were stratified by the nomogram scores. A total of six variables were determined related with survival and entered into the nomogram construction. The calibration curves showed satisfied agreement between nomogram-predicted survival and actual observed survival for 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival. By calculating the AIC and C-index values, our nomogram presented superior discriminative and risk-stratifying ability than current TNM staging system. Significant distinctions in survival curves were observed between different risk subgroups stratified by nomogram scores. The established and validated nomogram presented better risk-stratifying ability than current clinical staging system, and could provide a convenient and reliable tool for individual survival prediction and treatment strategy making.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Rafael Katayama, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil; Rafael Laurino Neto, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil
This article was submitted to Gastrointestinal Cancers: Gastric and Esophageal Cancers, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology
These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
Edited by: Fernando A. M. Herbella, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil
ISSN:2234-943X
2234-943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2021.736573