Measuring young infants' sensitivity to height-in-the-picture-plane by contrasting monocular and binocular preferential-looking

To examine young infants' sensitivity to a pictorial depth cue, we compared monocular and binocular preferential looking to objects of which depth was specified by height‐in‐the‐picture‐plane. For adults, this cue generates the perception that a lower object is closer than a higher object. This...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDevelopmental psychobiology Vol. 56; no. 1; pp. 109 - 116
Main Authors Tsuruhara, Aki, Corrow, Sherryse, Kanazawa, So, Yamaguchi, Masami K., Yonas, Albert
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To examine young infants' sensitivity to a pictorial depth cue, we compared monocular and binocular preferential looking to objects of which depth was specified by height‐in‐the‐picture‐plane. For adults, this cue generates the perception that a lower object is closer than a higher object. This study showed that 4‐ and 5‐month‐old infants fixated the lower, apparently closer, figure more often under the monocular than binocular presentation providing evidence of their sensitivity to the pictorial depth cue. Because the displays were identical in the two conditions except for binocular information for depth, the difference in looking‐behavior indicated sensitivity to depth information, excluding a possibility that they responded to 2D characteristics. This study also confirmed the usefulness of the method, preferential looking with a monocular and binocular comparison, to examine sensitivity to a pictorial depth cue in young infants, who are too immature to reach reliably for the closer of two objects. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Psychobiol 56: 109–116, 2014.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-BH36DB3B-Q
NICHD - No. 5T32HD007151
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science - No. 20539004; No. 21243041
University of Minnesota
National Institutes of Health
ArticleID:DEV21097
istex:3B20B70C48FBB8623295196E6368CCCDCA9CB57E
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0012-1630
1098-2302
DOI:10.1002/dev.21097