Prognostic and predictive value of intact and cleaved forms of the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor in metastatic prostate cancer

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of different forms of the urokinase receptor, uPAR, in serum from prostate cancer (PC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS The uPAR forms were measured in samples from 131 metastatic PC patients. These constituted a subset of pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Prostate Vol. 71; no. 8; pp. 899 - 907
Main Authors Almasi, Charlotte E., Brasso, Klaus, Iversen, Peter, Pappot, Helle, Høyer-Hansen, Gunilla, Danø, Keld, Christensen, Ib J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.06.2011
Wiley-Liss
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of different forms of the urokinase receptor, uPAR, in serum from prostate cancer (PC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS The uPAR forms were measured in samples from 131 metastatic PC patients. These constituted a subset of patients included in a randomized clinical trial of treatment with total androgen blockade (TAB) versus polyestradiol phosphate (PEP). Pre‐treatment serum levels of intact uPAR (uPAR(I–III)), intact plus cleaved uPAR (uPAR(I–III) + uPAR(II–III)) and domain I (uPAR(I)) were measured using time‐resolved fluorescence immunoassays (TR‐FIAs). RESULTS High serum levels of each of the uPAR forms were significantly associated with short overall survival (OS). The prognostic impact was strongest in the TAB treated patients with all uPAR forms being statistically significant. In multivariate analysis, uPAR(I–III) + uPAR(II–III) was an independent prognostic factor in TAB treated patients (HR = 5.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5–10.6, P < 0.0001) but not in PEP treated patients (P = 0.40). In the entire study population, OS was similar in the two treatment groups. The survival analysis showed significant interactions between treatment modality and the level of either uPAR(I–III) or uPAR(I–III) + uPAR(II–III). High levels of uPAR(I–III) + uPAR(II–III) were found to be predictive of effect of PEP versus TAB treatment. Patients with uPAR(I–III) + uPAR(II–III) levels above the median had significantly longer OS (median difference 11.3 months), if treated with PEP rather than with TAB (HR = 1.8, 95% CI:1.1–3.1, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION uPAR forms are significantly associated with OS. High uPAR(I–III) + uPAR(II–III) predicts longer OS in patients treated with PEP compared to TAB. uPAR forms are promising prognostic and predictive markers in PC. Prostate 71:899–907, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:EU - No. FP6 LSHC-CT-2003-503297 FP7 201279 MICROENVIMET
Dansk Kræftforsknings Fond
The Danish Research School in Molecular Cancer Research
istex:1EB4FBFD43E3F43C0EA058D5EAC2C8FE903622B4
ark:/67375/WNG-8N98GBVD-7
The Danish Cancer Society
ArticleID:PROS21306
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0270-4137
1097-0045
DOI:10.1002/pros.21306