Prognostic and predictive value of intact and cleaved forms of the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor in metastatic prostate cancer
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of different forms of the urokinase receptor, uPAR, in serum from prostate cancer (PC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS The uPAR forms were measured in samples from 131 metastatic PC patients. These constituted a subset of pa...
Saved in:
Published in | The Prostate Vol. 71; no. 8; pp. 899 - 907 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
01.06.2011
Wiley-Liss |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of different forms of the urokinase receptor, uPAR, in serum from prostate cancer (PC) patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
The uPAR forms were measured in samples from 131 metastatic PC patients. These constituted a subset of patients included in a randomized clinical trial of treatment with total androgen blockade (TAB) versus polyestradiol phosphate (PEP). Pre‐treatment serum levels of intact uPAR (uPAR(I–III)), intact plus cleaved uPAR (uPAR(I–III) + uPAR(II–III)) and domain I (uPAR(I)) were measured using time‐resolved fluorescence immunoassays (TR‐FIAs).
RESULTS
High serum levels of each of the uPAR forms were significantly associated with short overall survival (OS). The prognostic impact was strongest in the TAB treated patients with all uPAR forms being statistically significant. In multivariate analysis, uPAR(I–III) + uPAR(II–III) was an independent prognostic factor in TAB treated patients (HR = 5.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5–10.6, P < 0.0001) but not in PEP treated patients (P = 0.40). In the entire study population, OS was similar in the two treatment groups. The survival analysis showed significant interactions between treatment modality and the level of either uPAR(I–III) or uPAR(I–III) + uPAR(II–III). High levels of uPAR(I–III) + uPAR(II–III) were found to be predictive of effect of PEP versus TAB treatment. Patients with uPAR(I–III) + uPAR(II–III) levels above the median had significantly longer OS (median difference 11.3 months), if treated with PEP rather than with TAB (HR = 1.8, 95% CI:1.1–3.1, P = 0.03).
CONCLUSION
uPAR forms are significantly associated with OS. High uPAR(I–III) + uPAR(II–III) predicts longer OS in patients treated with PEP compared to TAB. uPAR forms are promising prognostic and predictive markers in PC. Prostate 71:899–907, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | EU - No. FP6 LSHC-CT-2003-503297 FP7 201279 MICROENVIMET Dansk Kræftforsknings Fond The Danish Research School in Molecular Cancer Research istex:1EB4FBFD43E3F43C0EA058D5EAC2C8FE903622B4 ark:/67375/WNG-8N98GBVD-7 The Danish Cancer Society ArticleID:PROS21306 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0270-4137 1097-0045 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pros.21306 |