Usefulness of ischemia-modified albumin in the diagnosis of sepsis/septic shock in the emergency department

OBJECTIVENo studies have evaluated the diagnostic value of ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) for the early detection of sepsis/septic shock in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). We aimed to assess the usefulness of IMA in diagnosing sepsis/septic shock in the ED. METHODSThis retrosp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical and experimental emergency medicine Vol. 7; no. 3; pp. 161 - 169
Main Authors Choo, Seung Hwa, Lim, Yong Su, Cho, Jin Seong, Jang, Jae Ho, Choi, Jea Yeon, Choi, Woo Sung, Yang, Hyuk Jun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 01.09.2020
대한응급의학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:OBJECTIVENo studies have evaluated the diagnostic value of ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) for the early detection of sepsis/septic shock in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). We aimed to assess the usefulness of IMA in diagnosing sepsis/septic shock in the ED. METHODSThis retrospective, observational study analyzed IMA, lactate, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin levels measured within 1 hour of ED arrival. Patients with suspected infection meeting at least two systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria were included and classified into the infection, sepsis, and septic shock groups using Sepsis-3 definitions. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine diagnostic performance. RESULTSThis study included 300 adult patients. The AUC (95% CI) of IMA levels (cut-off ≥85.5 U/mL vs. ≥87.5 U/mL) was higher for the diagnosis of sepsis than for that of septic shock (0.729 [0.667-0.791] vs. 0.681 [0.613-0.824]) and was higher than the AUC of procalcitonin levels (cut-off ≥1.58 ng/mL, 0.678 [0.613-0.742]) for the diagnosis of sepsis. When IMA and lactate levels were combined, the AUCs were 0.815 (0.762-0.867) and 0.806 (0.754-0.858) for the diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock, respectively. IMA levels independently predicted sepsis (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.09; P=0.029) and septic shock (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.11; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONOur findings indicate that IMA levels are a useful biomarker for diagnosing sepsis/septic shock early, and their combination with lactate levels can enhance the predictive power for early diagnosis of sepsis/septic shock in the ED.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2383-4625
2383-4625
DOI:10.15441/ceem.19.075