Differential Dependence of Hypoxia-inducible Factors 1α and 2α on mTORC1 and mTORC2

Constitutive expression of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) has been implicated in several proliferative disorders. Constitutive expression of HIF1α and HIF2α has been linked to a number of human cancers, especially renal cell carcinoma (RCC), in which HIF2α expression is the more important contributo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of biological chemistry Vol. 283; no. 50; pp. 34495 - 34499
Main Authors Toschi, Alfredo, Lee, Evan, Gadir, Noga, Ohh, Michael, Foster, David A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 12.12.2008
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Constitutive expression of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) has been implicated in several proliferative disorders. Constitutive expression of HIF1α and HIF2α has been linked to a number of human cancers, especially renal cell carcinoma (RCC), in which HIF2α expression is the more important contributor. Expression of HIF1α is dependent on the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and is sensitive to rapamycin. In contrast, there have been no reports linking HIF2α expression with mTOR. mTOR exists in two complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2, which are differentially sensitive to rapamycin. We report here that although there are clear differences in the sensitivity of HIF1α and HIF2α to rapamycin, both HIF1α and HIF2α expression is dependent on mTOR. HIF1α expression was dependent on both Raptor (a constituent of mTORC1) and Rictor (a constitutive of mTORC2). In contrast, HIF2α was dependent only on the mTORC2 constituent Rictor. These data indicate that although HIF1α is dependent on both mTORC1 and mTORC2, HIF2α is dependent only on mTORC2. We also examined the dependence of HIFα expression on the mTORC2 substrate Akt, which exists as three different isoforms, Akt1, Akt2, and Akt3. Interestingly, the expression of HIF2α was dependent on Akt2, whereas that of HIF1α was dependent on Akt3. Because HIF2α is apparently more critical in RCC, this study underscores the importance of targeting mTORC2 and perhaps Akt2 signaling in RCC and other proliferative disorders in which HIF2α has been implicated.
Bibliography:This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grant CA46677 from NCI and SCORE Grant GM60654 (to D. A. F.) and by Research Centers in Minority Institutions Award RR-03037 from the National Center for Research Resources of the National Institutes of Health, which supports infrastructure and instrumentation in the Department of Biological Sciences at Hunter College. This work was also supported by grants from the Canadian Cancer Society of the National Cancer Institute of Canada (to M. O.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
ISSN:0021-9258
1083-351X
DOI:10.1074/jbc.C800170200