Black-blood Venous Imaging (BBVI): A Contrast-Free and High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Approach for Diagnosing IVCS – a Proof of Concept Study

Background Iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS) diagnosis heavily relies on an imaging test. However, non-invasive and contrast-free imaging test for the diagnosis of IVCS remains a big challenge. To address this issue, this prospective study aimed to assess the image quality and diagnostic perfor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis Vol. 28; pp. 107602962211272 - 10760296221127275
Main Authors Cheng, Zhangbo, Wang, Hang, Lin, Shengmei, Yin, Lei, Su, Jiawei, Lei, Yunhong, Lan, Yongrong, Yan, Jun, Han, Tao, Ma, Mingping, Xie, Guoxi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 2022
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
SAGE Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS) diagnosis heavily relies on an imaging test. However, non-invasive and contrast-free imaging test for the diagnosis of IVCS remains a big challenge. To address this issue, this prospective study aimed to assess the image quality and diagnostic performance of a magnetic resonance imaging technique, black-blood venous imaging (BBVI), in detecting IVCS by comparing it with contrast-enhanced computed tomography venography (CTV) and using invasive digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference. Methods We enrolled 105 patients, and all patients underwent BBVI, CTV, and DSA examinations. We compared the consistency of CTV and BBVI image quality and their consistency in diagnosing the rate of iliac vein stenosis in IVCS patients. Using the consensus DSA as a reference, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of BBVI and CTV and their diagnostic agreement with DSA were calculated. Results BBVI demonstrated high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of IVCS, without contrast agents. BBVI and CTV are quite in diagnosis IVCS. Quite SE (67.8% vs 68.3%), SP (94.8% vs 94.8%), PPV (98.0% vs 98.0%), NPV (46.2% vs 46.9%) and ACC (75.3% vs 75.7%) were obtained by BBVI in comparison with CTV. Conclusion BBVI has comparable diagnostic performance with CTV. It may be a viable alternative to CTV techniques in screening the IVCS without contrast agents and free of ionizing radiation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Zhangbo Cheng, Hang Wang and Shengmei Lin contributed equally to this work
ISSN:1076-0296
1938-2723
DOI:10.1177/10760296221127275