Predictive Value of Dual-Energy CT-Derived Metrics for the Use of Bone Substitutes in Distal Radius Fracture Surgery

• Published in: Diagnostics (Basel) Vol. 14; no. 7; p. 697
• Main Authors: Reschke, Philipp, Koch, Vitali, Mahmoudi, Scherwin, Booz, Christian, Yel, Ibrahim, Gotta, Jennifer, Stahl, Adrian, Reschke, Robin, Scholtz, Jan-Erik, Martin, Simon S, Gruber-Rouh, Tatjana, Eichler, Katrin, Vogl, Thomas J, Gruenewald, Leon D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01.04.2024
• Subjects: Algorithms; Bone density; bone diseases; bone substitutes; Bones; computed tomography; CT imaging; Decomposition; Density; Fractures; Hydroxyapatite; Medical records; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Osteoporosis; osteoporotic fractures; Patients; Risk factors; Software; Statistical analysis; Surgery; Germany; Taiwan; computed tomography; bone substitutes; bone diseases; osteoporosis; osteoporotic fractures; bone density
• ISSN: 2075-4418; 2075-4418
• DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14070697

(1) Background: Low bone mineral density (BMD) is a significant risk factor for complicated surgery and leads to the increased use of bone substitutes in patients with distal radius fractures (DRFs). No accepted model has yet been established to predict the use of bone substitutes to facilitate preoperative planning. (2) Methods: Unenhanced dual-energy CT (DECT) images of DRFs were retrospectively acquired between March 2016 and September 2020 using the internal PACS system. Available follow-up imaging and medical health records were reviewed to determine the use of bone substitutes. DECT-based BMD, trabecular Hounsfield units (HU), cortical HU, and cortical thickness ratio were measured in non-fractured segments of the distal radius. Diagnostic accuracy parameters were calculated for all metrics using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and associations of all metrics with the use of bone substitutes were evaluated using logistic regression models. (3) The final study population comprised 262 patients (median age 55 years [IQR 43-67 years]; 159 females, 103 males). According to logistic regression analysis, DECT-based BMD was the only metric significantly associated with the use of bone substitutes (odds ratio 0.96, = 0.003). However, no significant associations were found for cortical HU ( = 0.06), trabecular HU ( = 0.33), or cortical thickness ratio ( = 0.21). ROC-curve analysis revealed that a combined model of all four metrics had the highest diagnostic accuracy with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.76. (4) Conclusions: DECT-based BMD measurements performed better than HU-based measurements and cortical thickness ratio. The diagnostic performance of all four metrics combined was superior to that of the individual parameters.