Concordance/discordance between serum apolipoprotein B, low density lipoprotein cholesterol and non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol in NATPOL 2011 participants – An epidemiological perspective

• Published in: International journal of cardiology Vol. 390; p. 131150
• Main Authors: Solnica, Bogdan, Sniderman, Allan D., Wyszomirski, Adam, Rutkowski, Marcin, Chlebus, Krzysztof, Bandosz, Piotr, Pencina, Michael J., Zdrojewski, Tomasz
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.11.2023
• Subjects: Atherosclerosis; Cardiovascular risk; Dyslipidemia; Lipid profile; Metabolic syndrome; Lipid profile; Metabolic syndrome; Atherosclerosis; Cardiovascular risk; Dyslipidemia
• ISSN: 0167-5273; 1874-1754; 1874-1754
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131150

The study compared the distribution of serum LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apolipoprotein B (apoB) among participants of the NATPOL 2011 survey and analysed concordance/discordance of results in the context of the risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Serum levels of apoB, LDL-C, non-HDL-C and small dense LDL-C were measured/calculated in 2067–2098 survey participants. The results were compared between women and men, age groups and in relation to body mass index (BMI), fasting glucose and TG levels, and the presence of CVD. Percentile distribution of lipid levels and concordance/discordance analysis were based on medians and ESC/EAS 2019 target thresholds for ASCVD risk and on comparison of measured apoB levels and levels calculated from linear regression equations with serum LDL- C and non-HDL-C as independent variables. Serum apoB, LDL-C and non-HDL-C were similarly related to sex, age, BMI, visceral obesity, cardiovascular disease, and fasting glucose and triglyceride levels. Serum apoB, LDL-C and non-HDL-C very high- and moderate- target thresholds were exceeded in 83%, 99% and 96.9% and in 41%, 75% and 63.7% of subjects, respectively. The incidence of the discordances between the results depended on the dividing values used and ranged from 0.2% to 45.2% of the respondents. Subjects with high apoB / low LDL-C/non-HDL-C discordance had features of metabolic syndrome. Diagnostic discordances between apoB and LDL-C/non-HDL-C indicate limitations of serum LDL-C/non-HDL-C in ASCVD risk management. Due to the high apoB/low LDL-C/non-HDL-C discordance, obese/metabolic syndrome patients may benefit from replacing LDL-C/non-HDL-C by apoB in ASCVD risk assessment and lipid-lowering therapy. •The serum apoB, LDL-C, and non-HDL-C targets set for the ASCVD risk are not distributed consistently across the population.•The frequency of diagnostic concordance/discordance of serum apoB / LDL-C/non-HDL-C depends on the dividing value used.•Serum apoB / LDL-C/non-HDL-C discordance is more common in patients with features of the metabolic syndrome.