The pathway through LC-MS method development: in-house or ready-to-use kit-based methods?
Historically, the determination of low concentration analytes was initially made possible by the development of rapid and easy-to-perform immunoassays (IAs). Unfortunately, typical problems inherent to IA technologies rapidly appeared (e.g. elevated cost, cross-reactivity, lot-to-lot variability, et...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Vol. 58; no. 6; pp. 1002 - 1009 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article Web Resource |
Language | English |
Published |
Germany
De Gruyter
25.06.2020
Walter De Gruyter & Company Walter de Gruyter |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Historically, the determination of low concentration analytes was initially made possible by the development of rapid and easy-to-perform immunoassays (IAs). Unfortunately, typical problems inherent to IA technologies rapidly appeared (e.g. elevated cost, cross-reactivity, lot-to-lot variability, etc.). In turn, liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods are sensitive and specific enough for such analyses. Therefore, they would seem to be the most promising candidates to replace IAs. There are two main choices when implementing a new LC-MS/MS method in a clinical laboratory: (1) Developing an in-house method or (2) purchasing ready-to-use kits. In this paper, we discuss some of the respective advantages, disadvantages and mandatory requirements of each choice. Additionally, we also share our experiences when developing an in-house method for cortisol determination and the implementation of an “ready-to-use” (RTU) kit for steroids analysis. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 scopus-id:2-s2.0-85081356276 |
ISSN: | 1434-6621 1437-4331 1437-4331 |
DOI: | 10.1515/cclm-2019-0916 |