Electrocardiographic characteristics in angiographically documented occlusion of the dominant left circumflex artery with acute inferior myocardial infarction: limitations of ST elevation III/II ratio and ST deviation in lateral limb leads

Abstract Background The prognosis of dominant left circumflex artery (LCx) occlusion-related inferior acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients is poor, but the electrocardiographic (ECG) characteristics of this AMI entity have not been described. Methods One hundred thirty-five patients with first...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of electrocardiology Vol. 42; no. 5; pp. 432 - 439
Main Authors Zhong-qun, Zhan, MS, Wei, Wang, MS, Shu-yi, Dang, MD, Chong-quan, Wang, MD, Jun-feng, Wang, MD, Zheng, Cao, MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.2009
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background The prognosis of dominant left circumflex artery (LCx) occlusion-related inferior acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients is poor, but the electrocardiographic (ECG) characteristics of this AMI entity have not been described. Methods One hundred thirty-five patients with first dominant right coronary artery (RCA) or dominant LCx-related inferior AMI were included. The characteristics of ECG obtained on admission for 55 patients with culprit lesions proximal to the first major right ventricular (RV) branch of dominant RCA (group proximal dominant RCA), 62 patients with culprit lesions distal to the first major RV branch of dominant RCA (group distal dominant RCA), and 18 patients with culprit lesions in dominant LCx (group dominant LCx) were compared. Results There were no significant differences among the 3 groups in the prevalence regarding an S/R ratio greater than 1:3 in aVL, ST elevation in aVR (ST↑aVR ), ST depression in aVR (ST↓aVR ) of 1 mm or more, and atrioventricular block. Greater ST elevation in lead III than in II and greater ST depression in aVL than I showed specificity of 17% and 44% to identify dominant RCA as culprit lesion, respectively. All 3 groups could be distinguished on the basis of ST↑V4R , ST↓V4R , ST↓V3 /ST↑III of 1.2 or less, and ST↓V3 /ST↑III of more than 1.2. Conclusions Greater ST elevation in lead III than in II, greater ST depression in aVL than I, and an S/R ratio of greater than 1:3 in aVL were not useful to discriminate between dominant RCA and dominant LCx occlusion-related inferior AMI. ST-segment deviation in lead V4 R and the ratio of ST↓V3 /ST↑III were useful in predicting the dominant artery occlusion-related inferior AMI.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-0736
1532-8430
DOI:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2009.03.015