Wide of the mark: Evidence on the underlying causes of overprecision in judgment

The reported probabilities form, on average, too flat a distribution, relative to the actual probability distribution. These data contradict the widely held assumption that overprecision in judgment arises due to overly narrow subjective probability distributions. (Experiment 3, “Still photo” quincu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOrganizational behavior and human decision processes Vol. 131; pp. 110 - 120
Main Authors Moore, Don A., Carter, Ashli B., Yang, Heather H.J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Elsevier Inc 01.11.2015
Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The reported probabilities form, on average, too flat a distribution, relative to the actual probability distribution. These data contradict the widely held assumption that overprecision in judgment arises due to overly narrow subjective probability distributions. (Experiment 3, “Still photo” quincunx condition.) [Display omitted] •We test the assumption that overprecision is due to narrow subjective probability distributions.•Subjective probability distributions are, in fact, too wide.•Findings contradict prevailing consensus on causes of overprecision.•Underprecision is reduced by experience.•Underprecision is reduced by framing the uncertainty as epistemic (vs. aleatory). Overprecision is the most robust and least understood form of overconfidence. In an attempt to elucidate the underlying causes of overprecision in judgment, the present paper offers a new approach – examining people’s beliefs about the likelihood of chance events drawn from known probability distributions. This approach allows us to test the assumption that low hit rates inside subjective confidence intervals arise because those confidence intervals are drawn too narrowly. In fact, subjective probability distributions are systematically too wide, or insufficiently precise. This result raises profound questions for the study of overconfidence.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0749-5978
1095-9920
DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.09.003