Student teachers' mathematical questioning and courage in metaphorical thinking learning

This study was designed in the form of experiments with control group design and post-test only which aimed to examine the role of metaphorical thinking learning in the mathematical questioning ability of student teachers based on the level of mathematical courage. The population of this study was s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of physics. Conference series Vol. 948; no. 1; pp. 12019 - 12023
Main Authors Hendriana, H, Hidayat, W, Ristiana, M G
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bristol IOP Publishing 01.01.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study was designed in the form of experiments with control group design and post-test only which aimed to examine the role of metaphorical thinking learning in the mathematical questioning ability of student teachers based on the level of mathematical courage. The population of this study was student teachers of mathematics education study program in West Java Province, while the sample of this study was 152 student teachers which were set purposively and then randomly to be included in the experimental class and control class. Based on the results and discussion, it was concluded that: (a) the mathematical questioning ability of student teachers who received Metaphorical Thinking learning was better than those who received conventional learning seen from mathematical courage level; (b) learning and mathematical courage level factors affected the achievement of student teachers' mathematical questioning ability. In addition, there was no interaction effect between learning and mathematical courage level (high, medium, and low) simultaneously in developing student teachers' mathematical questioning ability; (c) achievement of mastering mathematical questioning ability of student teacher was still not well achieved on indicator of problem posing in the form of non-routine question and open question.
ISSN:1742-6588
1742-6596
DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012019