Magnesium monitoring practice in monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies therapy
Summary What is known and Objective It is now estimated that about 5% of cetuximab‐treated patients and about 3% of panitumumab‐treated patients will develop grade 3–4 hypomagnesemia. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of magnesium monitoring in patients treated with epidermal growth fac...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics Vol. 38; no. 2; pp. 101 - 103 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.04.2013
Blackwell Hindawi Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Summary
What is known and Objective
It is now estimated that about 5% of cetuximab‐treated patients and about 3% of panitumumab‐treated patients will develop grade 3–4 hypomagnesemia. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of magnesium monitoring in patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐targeting antibodies and to estimate the incidence of hypomagnesemia in these patients at our institution.
Methods
A 2‐year retrospective study was carried out. At least four doses of weekly cetuximab or two doses of bi‐weekly panitumumab were required for inclusion. Serum magnesium profiles were reviewed from 1 month before treatment until 3 months after treatment discontinuation, and patients with <2 determinations were excluded.
Results and Discussion
Two hundred and one patients received at least one dose of EGFR‐targeting antibodies, but only 68 met the inclusion criteria. Seventy patients had <2 magnesium determinations. The overall hypomagnesemia was 58·82% (40 of 68 patients), with a 4·41% grade 3 hypomagnesemia (three of 68 patients). No grade 4 hypomagnesemia was detected.
What is new and Conclusion
There is a lack of magnesium monitoring in these patients. Serum magnesium determinations should be done every 4–8 weeks in patients treated with EGFR‐targeting antibodies, as it is a useful surrogate marker for both toxicity and efficacy. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:3D0F3FEA01221E52B0857946352867DAC848EE45 ark:/67375/WNG-DT5LMSS9-Q ArticleID:JCPT12028 |
ISSN: | 0269-4727 1365-2710 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jcpt.12028 |