Evaluation of a non-invasive monitoring method for free flap breast reconstruction using laser doppler flowmetrie and tissue spectrophotometry

Background Despite advances in the monitoring of free flaps, there is still a demand for new technology to detect ischemic complications at an early stage. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of the O2C‐device in terms of detecting flap failure in commonly used perforator fl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMicrosurgery Vol. 33; no. 5; pp. 350 - 357
Main Authors Rothenberger, Jens, Amr, Amro, Schaller, Hans-Eberhard, Rahmanian-Schwarz, Afshin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Despite advances in the monitoring of free flaps, there is still a demand for new technology to detect ischemic complications at an early stage. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of the O2C‐device in terms of detecting flap failure in commonly used perforator flaps for breast reconstruction. Methods A total of 34 patients undergoing breast reconstruction were involved in this study. The perfusion dynamics of 23 deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps and 11 superior gluteal arterial perforator flaps were assessed using the O2C‐device, which combines a laser light, to determine blood flow (flow), velocity, and white light to determine hemoglobin oxygenation (SO2) and relative amount of hemoglobin (rHB). Measurements were carried out intra‐operatively after clamping and declamping the perforator vessels. In the post‐operative period measurements were carried out every hour for the first 48 hours and from 3rd to 7th for every 2 hours. These dates were compared to findings of clinical assessment. Results Several intra‐operative measurements, during the clamping and declamping the different perforator vessels, revealed a high correlation for all parameters: Flow (r = 0.89, P < 0. 05), Velo (r = 0.92, P < 0. 05), SO2 (r =0.84, P <0. 05), and rHB (r =0.83 P < 0.05). Vessel occlusion was detected in five cases, of which three were due to arterial thrombosis and two further cases were due to venous occlusion. Of the five cases, one flap loss caused by venous occlusion was noted. Conclusion The O2C‐device seems to be a reliable, objective, and non‐invasive device for the monitoring of free flaps. Thus, it may improve flap survival rates by detecting vascular compromise at an early stage. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 33:350–357, 2013.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-4C2B3P8D-M
ArticleID:MICR22096
istex:1C719A75E37468A6D359FFE71371786911D166A4
The first two authors share first authorship of this article.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0738-1085
1098-2752
DOI:10.1002/micr.22096