Are normolipidaemic patients with xanthelasma prone to atherosclerosis?

• Published in: Clinical and experimental dermatology Vol. 40; no. 4; pp. 373 - 378
• Main Authors: Esmat, S., Abdel-Halim, M. R. E., Fawzy, M. M., Nassef, S., Ramzy, T., El Fouly, E. S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2015; Oxford University Press
• Subjects: Adult; Atherosclerosis; Atherosclerosis - diagnostic imaging; Atherosclerosis - etiology; Atherosclerosis - physiopathology; Biomarkers - blood; Body Mass Index; C-Reactive Protein - analysis; Carotid Intima-Media Thickness; Case-Control Studies; Cholesterol; Cholesterol - blood; Drug therapy; Female; Humans; Hypertension - diagnosis; Leukocyte Count; Lipoprotein(a) - blood; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity - complications; Risk Factors; Smoking - adverse effects; Xanthomatosis - blood; Xanthomatosis - complications; Xanthomatosis - physiopathology
• ISSN: 0307-6938; 1365-2230
• DOI: 10.1111/ced.12594

Summary Background When patients with xanthelasma are found to have normal lipid levels, dermatologists usually proceed with their treatment without further investigations. However, there is some evidence that normolipidaemic patients with xanthelasma (NPX) have a similar cardiovascular risk to hyperlipidaemic patients with xanthelasma (HPX). Aim To evaluate the risk of atherosclerosis in Egyptian NPX compared with HPX and controls. Methods In total, 20 NPX, 20 HPX and 40 normolipidaemic controls were enrolled. All participants were matched for age and sex. Diabetes was an exclusion factor. Carotid ultrasonography was used to measure intima–media thickness (IMT). Other risk factors of atherosclerosis such as high blood pressure, obesity and smoking were also assessed, as well as atherosclerotic markers, including total leucocytic count (TLC), C‐reactive protein and lipoprotein a. Results Although still within the normal range, total cholesterol and triglycerides were significantly higher in NPX compared with controls. IMT was significantly higher in NPX compared with controls, but lower than that of HPX. The increased IMT in NPX was not related to any of the studied risk factors. Apart from significantly higher body mass index and TLC, NPX showed no significant differences from controls for other risk factors of atherosclerosis or for atherosclerotic markers. Conclusion NPX seem to have a higher risk of atherosclerosis independent of lipid concentrations, and should therefore be fully investigated in order to allow detection and early management of such risk.