Teasing apart the anticipatory and consummatory processing of monetary incentives: An event-related potential study of reward dynamics

• Published in: Psychophysiology Vol. 52; no. 11; pp. 1470 - 1482
• Main Authors: Novak, Keisha D., Foti, Dan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2015
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Anticipation, Psychological - physiology; Attention - physiology; Brain - physiology; Brain Mapping; Contingent negative variation; Contingent Negative Variation - physiology; Cues; Electroencephalography; ERP; Evoked Potentials - physiology; Experimental psychology; Feedback negativity; Female; Humans; Male; Monetary incentives; Neural networks; Reaction Time - physiology; Reward; Young Adult; ERP; Feedback negativity; P3; Reward; Contingent negative variation
• ISSN: 0048-5772; 1469-8986; 1540-5958
• DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12504

The monetary incentive delay (MID) task has been widely used in fMRI studies to investigate the neural networks involved in anticipatory and consummatory reward processing. Previous efforts to adapt the MID task for use with ERPs, however, have had limited success. Here, we sought to further decompose reward dynamics using a comprehensive set of anticipatory (cue‐N2, cue‐P3, contingent negative variation [CNV]) and consummatory ERPs (feedback negativity [FN], feedback P3 [fb‐P3]). ERP data was recorded during adapted versions of the MID task across two experiments. Unlike previous studies, monetary incentive cues modulated the cue‐N2, cue‐P3, and CNV; however, cue‐related ERPs and the CNV were uncorrelated with one another, indicating distinct anticipatory subprocesses. With regard to consummatory processing, FN amplitude primarily tracked outcome valence (reward vs. nonreward), whereas fb‐P3 amplitude primarily tracked outcome salience (uncertain vs. certain). Independent modulation of the cue‐P3 and fb‐P3 was observed, indicating that these two P3 responses may uniquely capture the allocation of attention during anticipatory and consummatory reward processing, respectively. Overall, across two samples, consistent evidence of both anticipatory and consummatory ERP activity was observed on an adapted version of the MID paradigm, demonstrating for the first time how these ERP components may be integrated with one another to more fully characterize the time course of reward processing. This ERP‐MID paradigm is well suited to parsing reward dynamics, and can be applied to both healthy and clinical populations.