Heart rate variability stabilization in athletes: towards more convenient data acquisition

• Published in: Clinical physiology and functional imaging Vol. 36; no. 5; pp. 331 - 336
• Main Authors: Flatt, Andrew A., Esco, Michael R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2016; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Adolescent; Athletes; autonomic; cardiovascular; Electrocardiography - methods; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; monitoring; parasympathetic; Physical Endurance; Physical Fitness; Predictive Value of Tests; Reproducibility of Results; Running; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; stability; Supine Position; Time Factors; vagal; Young Adult; autonomic; vagal; parasympathetic; cardiovascular; monitoring; stability
• ISSN: 1475-0961; 1475-097X; 1475-097X
• DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12233

Summary Resting heart rate variability (HRV) is a potentially useful marker to consider for monitoring training status in athletes. However, traditional HRV data collection methodology requires a 5‐min recording period preceded by a 5‐min stabilization period. This lengthy process may limit HRV monitoring in the field due to time constraints and high compliance demands of athletes. Investigation into more practical methodology for HRV data acquisitions is required. The aim of this study was to determine the time course for stabilization of ECG‐derived lnRMSSD from traditional HRV recordings. Ten‐minute supine ECG measures were obtained in ten male and ten female collegiate cross‐country athletes. The first 5 min for each ECG was separately analysed in successive 1‐min intervals as follows: minutes 0–1 (lnRMSSD0–1), 1–2 (lnRMSSD1–2), 2–3 (lnRMSSD2–3), 3–4 (lnRMSSD3–4) and 4–5 (lnRMSSD4–5). Each 1‐min lnRMSSD segment was then sequentially compared to lnRMSSD of the 5‐ to 10‐min ECG segment, which was considered the criterion (lnRMSSDCriterion). There were no significant differences between each 1‐min lnRMSSD segment and lnRMSSDCriterion, and the effect sizes were considered trivial (ES ranged from 0·07 to 0·12). In addition, the ICC for each 1‐min segment compared to the criterion was near perfect (ICC values ranged from 0·92 to 0·97). The limits of agreement between the prerecording values and lnRMSSDCriterion ranged from ±0·28 to ±0·45 ms. These results lend support to shorter, more convenient ECG recording procedures for lnRMSSD assessment in athletes by reducing the prerecording stabilization period to 1 min.