Photodynamic therapy in the treatment of class II furcation: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Aim To investigate the effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) as adjunct to mechanical therapy in furcations. Materials and Methods A double‐blind, parallel, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in subjects presenting class II furcations. The subjects were randomly allocated to a test (P...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical periodontology Vol. 40; no. 8; pp. 781 - 788
Main Authors Luchesi, Vanessa H., Pimentel, Suzana P., Kolbe, Maria F., Ribeiro, Fernanda V., Casarin, Renato C., Nociti Jr, Francisco H., Sallum, Enilson A., Casati, Marcio Z.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aim To investigate the effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) as adjunct to mechanical therapy in furcations. Materials and Methods A double‐blind, parallel, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in subjects presenting class II furcations. The subjects were randomly allocated to a test (PDT; n = 16) or control group (non‐activated laser/only photosensitizer; n = 21). At baseline, 3 and 6 months, clinical, microbiological and cytokine pattern evaluation was performed. Clinical attachment level was defined as the primary outcome variable. Results Clinical parameters improved after both therapies (p < 0.05) with no differences between groups at any time point (p > 0.05). At 6 months, real‐time PCR evaluation showed a decrease in Porphyromonas gingivalis and Tannerella forsythia only in the PDT group (p < 0.05) with no inter‐group differences. Regarding cytokines, IL‐4 and IL‐10 levels increased in both groups at 6 months. GM‐CSF, IL‐8, IL‐1β and IL‐6 levels decreased only in the PDT group after 3 months (p < 0.05). At 3 months, inter‐group analyses showed that GM‐CSF, IFN‐γ, IL‐6 and IL‐8 levels were lower in the PDT group. At 6 months, lower IL‐1β levels were also observed in the PDT group (p < 0.05). Conclusion Photodynamic therapy did not promote clinical benefits for class II furcations; however, advantages in local levels of cytokines and a reduction in periodontopathogens were demonstrated.
Bibliography:istex:F41749478C60E55B3B28D18FDE0AF5D3A20BB4BC
ark:/67375/WNG-13WD6CS2-B
ArticleID:JCPE12121
This study was supported by FAPESP (São Paulo Research Foundation) – processes 2010/51218‐8 and the National Council for Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq) – processes 303693/2009‐6. The authors report no conflicts of interest related to this study.
Conflict of interest and source of funding
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0303-6979
1600-051X
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.12121