Cutaneous adverse reactions following COVID‐19 vaccinations: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Background COVID‐19 vaccines are currently the most effective interventions in controlling and preventing severe disease progression. Dermatologic reactions to COVID‐19 vaccinations may be rare among clinical trial participants. However, since global mass vaccination became a reality, these adverse...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cosmetic dermatology Vol. 21; no. 9; pp. 3636 - 3650
Main Authors Shafie'ei, Mohammad, Jamali, Marzieh, Akbari, Zahra, Sarvipour, Nastaran, Ahmadzade, Mohadese, Ahramiyanpour, Najmeh
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England John Wiley and Sons Inc 01.09.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background COVID‐19 vaccines are currently the most effective interventions in controlling and preventing severe disease progression. Dermatologic reactions to COVID‐19 vaccinations may be rare among clinical trial participants. However, since global mass vaccination became a reality, these adverse effects may become more widespread, and different skin reactions would arise. Objective To systematically review the cutaneous adverse reactions in cases subject to vaccines for COVID‐19. Methods We searched the PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Embase databases, identifying the relevant records and including the eligible observational ones. After assessing the methodological quality of the included studies, we qualitatively and quantitatively synthesized the data regarding the cutaneous side effects experienced by those in the studies' population. Results Overall, 36 studies were included in our systematic review, with the majority being cross‐sectional. We found that pain, erythema, and swelling were the most common local side effects, while different types of rashes, urticaria, and angioedema were the most non‐local. Few cases also reported experiencing flare‐ups of their underlying diseases or developing newly‐onset diseases of various etiologies. Our meta‐analyses also found that while viral vector‐based vaccines are, though insignificantly, safer in injection site complaints, individuals who received mRNA vaccines developed significantly fewer non‐local cutaneous adverse events. Discussion Cutaneous reactions to the COVID‐19 vaccines are similar to common cutaneous drug eruptions and COVID‐19 cutaneous manifestations. However, we believe that further high‐quality research is needed to assess better how and why cutaneous reactions occur in different vaccines.
ISSN:1473-2130
1473-2165
DOI:10.1111/jocd.15261