Sleep Dysfunction and its Association to Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Updated Review

• Published in: Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology Vol. 2; no. 2; pp. 46 - 52
• Main Authors: Orb, Quinn, Orlandi, Richard R., Alt, Jeremiah A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.04.2017; John Wiley and Sons Inc
• Subjects: Allergy, Rhinology, and Immunology; Chronic illnesses; chronic rhinosinusitis; Comorbidity; Cytokines; Endoscopy; Etiology; Eye movements; Hypotheses; Inflammation; Nasal obstruction; Nose; Pain; Patients; Population; Quality; quality of life; Questionnaires; Rhinitis; Sinuses; Sinusitis; Sleep apnea; sleep dysfunction; sleep quality; Studies; Surgery; chronic rhinosinusitis; Nasal obstruction; quality of life; sleep quality; sleep dysfunction
• ISSN: 2378-8038; 0023-852X; 2378-8038
• DOI: 10.1002/lio2.60

Background Poor sleep has significant effects on health contributing to increased morbidity and mortality. The direct and indirect costs of sleep dysfunction total well in to the billions of dollars annually in the United States. Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) affects up to 16% of the US population and has been linked to poor sleep quality with up to three quarters of patients with CRS reporting poor sleep quality. There is a growing body of literature evaluating the relationship between sleep and CRS. In this review, we organize and present the current knowledge on the associations between sleep and CRS as well as identify areas for further investigation. Data sources A structured literature search from 1946 to 2016 was conducted in the English language using OVID MEDLINE database, PubMed, and EMBASE. Review methods s were reviewed for relevance and appropriate studies were included in the narrative review. Results Studies were analyzed and discussed as they pertained to the following categories of CRS and sleep: (1) subjective measures of sleep dysfunction, (2) objective measures of sleep dysfunction, and (3) outcomes on sleep quality following treatment of CRS. Articles on the pathophysiology of sleep dysfunction in CRS were separately reviewed. Conclusions An evolving body of research demonstrates that quality of sleep is compromised in the majority of patients with CRS. Following treatment of CRS, there is significant improvement in subjective sleep quality, but additional research investigating objective measures following treatment is still needed. Additionally, further investigation is required to better elucidate the underlying pathophysiology of the relationship between sleep dysfunction and CRS. Level of Evidence N/A.