Identification of low responders to a 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose in patients undergoing coronary stenting
Although patients undergoing coronary stenting routinely receive dual antiplatelet treatment to reduce the risk of stent thrombosis, this undesired event still occurs. A suboptimal response to clopidogrel treatment (low responders) has been suggested to contribute to stent thrombosis. In the present...
Saved in:
Published in | Thrombosis research Vol. 115; no. 1; pp. 101 - 108 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, NY
Elsevier Ltd
2005
Elsevier Science |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Although patients undergoing coronary stenting routinely receive dual antiplatelet treatment to reduce the risk of stent thrombosis, this undesired event still occurs. A suboptimal response to clopidogrel treatment (low responders) has been suggested to contribute to stent thrombosis. In the present study, platelet function profiles were assessed in patients undergoing coronary stenting receiving a standard 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose with the aim to identify low clopidogrel responders.
Platelet aggregation was assessed by light transmittance aggregometry following 6 μM ADP stimuli in 48 patients before and 10 min, 4 and 24 h after receiving clopidogrel front-loading. Patients having ≥40% inhibition of platelet aggregation 24 h after clopidogrel administration were defined as normal responders, whereas those having <40% inhibition were low responders. Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa activation and P-selectin expression were assessed by whole blood flow cytometry following 2 μM ADP stimuli at the same time points. Platelet function profiles were compared between normal and low clopidogrel responders.
Twenty-seven patients (56%) were normal responders and 21 (44%) low responders. Baseline GP IIb/IIIa activation was higher in low responders (74.6±16.6% vs. 58.2±24.5%,
p=0.03). Although GP IIb/IIIa activation reduced following clopidogrel front-loading in both groups, it remained increased among low responders at 24 h (58.6±21.3% vs. 40.2±28.7%,
p=0.05) and during the overall study time course (
p=0.02). There were no differences in P-selectin expression.
A considerable proportion of patients have an early suboptimal response to a 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose. An increased GP IIb/IIIa activation before intervention may identify this group of patients suggesting the use of a more aggressive antithrombotic treatment in these individuals. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0049-3848 1879-2472 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.thromres.2004.07.007 |