Central males instead of multiple pairs in redfronted lemurs, Eulemur fulvus rufus (Primates, Lemuridae)?

• Published in: Animal behaviour Vol. 58; no. 5; pp. 1069 - 1078
• Main Authors: Ostner, Julia, Kappeler, Peter M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Kent Elsevier Ltd 01.11.1999; Elsevier; Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd
• Subjects: Animal behavior; Animal ethology; Animal reproduction; Biological and medical sciences; Eulemur fulvus rufus; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Madagascar; Mammalia; Primates; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Vertebrata; Malagasy Republic; Africa; Social group; Lemuroidea; Biological rhythm; Mating; Reproduction; Vertebrata; Mammalia; Animal activity; Spatial distribution; Social dominance; Social interaction; Group cohesiveness; Primates; Social organization; Field study
• ISSN: 0003-3472; 1095-8282
• DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1222

In group-living Malagasy primates (Lemuriformes), certain demographic and morphological traits deviate both from theoretical expectations derived from sexual selection theory and from patterns in better-known anthropoid primates. Lemurs lack sexual dimorphism in body and canine size and live in relatively small multimale–multifemale groups with, on average, even adult sex ratios, despite a polygynous mating system. In addition, the majority of gregarious lemurs are cathemeral, that is, they are regularly active both day and night. The social system of cathemeral lemurs has been considered an adaptation to their activity pattern. If so, groups should consist of multiple pairs that aggregate during diurnal activity and range separately at night in response to predation and infanticide risk, respectively. Moreover, mating privileges should exist between pair partners. We tested this hypothesis with data collected on two groups of wild redfronted lemurs in western Madagascar during 1023 focal animal hours spanning 4 months including the mating season. In addition, data on spatial relations were collected on 12 nights. We found no differences in group cohesion between day and night and no behavioural evidence for multiple male–female pairs. Instead, one male in each group monopolized social interactions with all females. However, females copulated with all resident males, although most often with the central male. Thus, basic predictions of the cathemerality hypothesis are unsupported. Multiple matings and indications of oestrous synchrony can be viewed as female counterstrategies against infanticide, whereas reproductive strategies of redfronted lemur males remain obscure.