Virus rejection with two model human enteric viruses in membrane bioreactor system

• Published in: Science China. Chemistry Vol. 50; no. 3; pp. 397 - 404
• Main Authors: Zheng, Xiang, Liu, JunXin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: China Springer Nature B.V 01.06.2007; Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China%Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; Science in China Press
• Subjects: Activated sludge; Biological activity; Bioreactors; Deactivation; Drinking water; Membranes; Microorganisms; Rejection; Sludge; Viruses; model virus; MBR; enteric virus; inactivation
• ISSN: 1006-9291; 1674-7291; 1862-2771; 1869-1870
• DOI: 10.1007/s11426-007-0047-3

A membrane bioreactor (MBR) with gravity drain was tested for virus rejection with two coliphages, T4 and f2, which were used as surrogates for human enteric viruses. Virus rejection was investigated by PVDF and PP membrane modules, with the pore sizes of 0.22 and 0.1 μm, respectively. In tap water system, 2.1 lg rejection of coliphage T4 could be achieved by PVDF membrane compared with complete rejection by PP membrane, while for coliphage f2 with smaller diameter, 0.3-0.5 lg rejection of the influent virus was removed by the two membranes. In domestic wastewater system, cake layer and gel layer on the membrane surface changed the cut-off size of the membrane so that there was no significant difference between PP and PVDF for each coliphage. The removal ratios of coliphage T4 and f2 in the MBR were more than 5.5 and 3.0 lg, respectively. Compared with 5.5 lg removal for virus T4 in the MBR system, only 2.1 lg (96.8%-99.9%) removal rate was observed in the conventional activated sludge system with the influent virus concentration fluctuating from 1830 to 57000 PFU/mL. Only 0.8%-22% virus removal was the effect of adsorption to activated sludge, which showed a decreasing tendency with the retention time, while 75%-98% was the effect of virus inactivation by microbial activity. It indicated that the major mechanism of virus removal was not the transfer of viruses from the water phase to the sludge phase but inactivation in the biological treatment process.