Age Changes in Interlimb Coupling and the Development of Bimanual Coordination

• Published in: Journal of motor behavior Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 199 - 208
• Main Authors: Fagard, Jacqueline, Pezé, Anna
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Washington, DC Taylor & Francis Group 01.09.1997; Heldref
• Subjects: bimanual coordination; Biological and medical sciences; development; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; infants; reaching; spatiotemporal coupling; Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports; Human; Manual task; Coordination; Body movement; Goal directed movement; Infant; Developmental stage; Motricity; Motor control; Hand; Age; development; reaching; infants; bimanual coordination; spatiotemporal coupling
• ISSN: 0022-2895; 1940-1027
• DOI: 10.1080/00222899709600835

Changes in interlimb coupling, and their role in the development of bimanual coordination, were studied longitudinally in 6- to 12-month-old infants (N = 6). Infants were observed while they were reaching for simple objects of 2 different sizes. Their use of a uni- versus bimanual strategy for reaching as well as the coupling of their bimanual movements were compared; progress in bimanual coordination of complementary movements was evaluated on 3 different bimanual tasks. The bimanual tasks involved an asymmetrical cooperation between the 2 hands. Although spatiotemporal coupling of bimanual reaching movements did not decrease during the age period studied, infants around 7 months of age used their 2 hands infrequently for reaching. Occurrences of bimanual reaching were particularly low at the session preceding the first bimanual success at a bimanual task. This suggests that the temporal coincidence between greater independence of the 2 hands and progress in bimanual coordination of complementary movements acts in 2 directions: Infants may be more at ease when using their 2 hands in differentiated patterns as the hands move less in synchrony, but, in turn, they may be less likely to move their hands in synchrony as they anticipate mirror manipulations of the object less. The frequency of bimanual reaching increased toward the end of the 1st year. This might have been caused by an increase in the repertoire of bimanual asymmetrical object manipulations and by the fact that the development of bimanual coordination allows infants to manipulate objects with complementary movements even after a bimanual approach toward the object.