Effectiveness of Hypertension Management Strategies in SPRINT-Eligible US Adults: A Simulation Study

• Published in: Journal of the American Heart Association Vol. 13; no. 2; p. e032370
• Main Authors: Zhang, Fengdi, Bryant, Kelsey B, Moran, Andrew E, Zhang, Yiyi, Cohen, Jordana B, Bress, Adam P, Sheppard, James P, King, Jordan B, Derington, Catherine G, Weintraub, William S, Kronish, Ian M, Shea, Steven, Bellows, Brandon K
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England John Wiley and Sons Inc 16.01.2024; Wiley
• Subjects: Adult; Antihypertensive Agents - pharmacology; Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use; Blood Pressure; cardiovascular diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology; Humans; hypertension; Hypertension - diagnosis; Hypertension - drug therapy; Hypertension - epidemiology; Original Research; Risk Factors; United States - epidemiology; United States; blood pressure; hypertension; cardiovascular diseases
• ISSN: 2047-9980; 2047-9980
• DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032370

Despite reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and death in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial), intensive systolic blood pressure goals have not been adopted in the United States. This study aimed to simulate the potential long-term impact of 4 hypertension management strategies in SPRINT-eligible US adults. The validated Blood Pressure Control-Cardiovascular Disease Policy Model, a discrete event simulation of hypertension care processes (ie, visit frequency, blood pressure [BP] measurement accuracy, medication intensification, and medication adherence) and CVD outcomes, was populated with 25 000 SPRINT-eligible US adults. Four hypertension management strategies were simulated: (1) usual care targeting BP <140/90 mm Hg (Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure usual care), (2) intensive care per the SPRINT protocol targeting BP <120/90 mm Hg (SPRINT intensive), (3) usual care targeting guideline-recommended BP <130/80 mm Hg (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association usual care), and (4) team-based care added to usual care and targeting BP <130/80 mm Hg. Relative to the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure usual care, among the 18.1 million SPRINT-eligible US adults, an estimated 138 100 total CVD events could be prevented per year with SPRINT intensive, 33 900 with American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association usual care, and 89 100 with team-based care. Compared with the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure usual care, SPRINT intensive care was projected to increase treatment-related serious adverse events by 77 600 per year, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association usual care by 33 300, and team-based care by 27 200. As BP control has declined in recent years, health systems must prioritize hypertension management and invest in effective strategies. Adding team-based care to usual care may be a pragmatic way to manage risk in this high-CVD-risk population.