Implanted neuroprosthesis for assisting arm and hand function after stroke: a case study

Loss of arm and hand function is common after stroke. An implantable, 12-channel, electromyogram (EMG)-controlled functional electrical stimulation neuroprosthesis (NP) may be a viable assistive device for upper-limb hemiplegia. In this study, a research participant 4.8 yr poststroke underwent presu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of rehabilitation research and development Vol. 49; no. 10; pp. 1505 - 1516
Main Authors Knutson, Jayme S, Chae, John, Hart, Ronald L, Keith, Michael W, Hoyen, Harry A, Harley, Mary Y, Hisel, Terri Z, Bryden, Anne M, Kilgore, Kevin L, Peckham, Hunter
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Superintendent of Documents 01.01.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Loss of arm and hand function is common after stroke. An implantable, 12-channel, electromyogram (EMG)-controlled functional electrical stimulation neuroprosthesis (NP) may be a viable assistive device for upper-limb hemiplegia. In this study, a research participant 4.8 yr poststroke underwent presurgical screening, surgical installation of the NP, training, and assessment of upper-limb impairment, activity limitation, and satisfaction over a 2.3 yr period. The NP increased active range of finger extension from 3 to 96 degrees, increased lateral pinch force from 16 to 29 N, increased the number of objects from 1 to 4 out of 6 that the participant could grasp and place in a Grasp-Release Test, and increased the Arm Motor Abilities Test score by 0.3 points. The upper-limb Fugl-Meyer score increased from 27 at baseline to 36 by the end of the study. The participant reported using the NP at home 3-4 d/wk, up to 3 h/d for exercise and household tasks. The effectiveness of the NP to assist with activities of daily living was dependent on the degree of flexor tone, which varied with task and level of fatigue. The EMG-based control strategy was not successfully implemented; button presses were used instead. Further advancements in technology may improve ease of use and address limitations caused by muscle spasticity.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Case Study-3
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-2
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0748-7711
1938-1352
DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.09.0171