Biofortification, biodiversity and diet: A search for complementary applications against poverty and malnutrition
Biofortification, the focus of the HarvestPlus program of the Consultative Group on International Agriculture Research (CGIAR), represents a potentially powerful tool to increase dietary intake of essential nutrients in staple foods. This paper evaluates the compatibility of biofortification with th...
Saved in:
Published in | Food policy Vol. 32; no. 1; pp. 1 - 24 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Ltd
01.02.2007
Elsevier |
Series | Food Policy |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Biofortification, the focus of the HarvestPlus program of the Consultative Group on International Agriculture Research (CGIAR), represents a potentially powerful tool to increase dietary intake of essential nutrients in staple foods. This paper evaluates the compatibility of biofortification with the preferred option of dietary diversification and its potential impacts on the agricultural biodiversity essential for long term sustainability. In poor countries, biofortification requires increasing public investment in agricultural research and infrastructure for success. Rather than cereal commodities, biofortification for developing countries should focus on vegetatively propagated species or in improving quality of coarse cereals, as well as fodders. Community participatory approaches that identify local food resources with nutritional, agronomic and economic advantages to small-scale farmers could complement and set targets for biofortification as one of many approaches to alleviate nutritional deficiencies. Furthermore using agricultural biodiversity to reinforce dietary diversity can help situate biofortification within the larger context of sustainable food-based approaches. In this light, this paper evaluates specific biofortification interventions from environmental, sociocultural, political, economic, ethical, and biomedical perspectives. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.03.014 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0306-9192 1873-5657 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.03.014 |