The metabolic syndrome in elderly individuals is associated with greater muscular, but not elastic arterial stiffness, independent of low-grade inflammation, endothelial dysfunction or insulin resistance-The Hoorn Study

The metabolic syndrome (MetS) increases cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. How MetS increases CVD risk is incompletely understood, but increasing arterial stiffness is one candidate link, which in turn could be explained by (low-grade) inflammation, endothelial dysfunction (ED) or insulin resistance...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of human hypertension Vol. 23; no. 11; pp. 718 - 727
Main Authors HENRY, Rma, FERREIRA, I, DEKKER, J. M, NIJPELS, G, SCHEFFER, P. G, STEHOUWER, Cda
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basingstoke Nature Publishing Group 01.11.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The metabolic syndrome (MetS) increases cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. How MetS increases CVD risk is incompletely understood, but increasing arterial stiffness is one candidate link, which in turn could be explained by (low-grade) inflammation, endothelial dysfunction (ED) or insulin resistance (IR). However, MetS-related increases in stiffness may not be uniformly distributed over muscular and elastic arteries. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine: (1) the associations between the MetS, and muscular and elastic arterial stiffness, and (2) whether any such associations could be explained by inflammation, ED or IR. These questions were addressed in the Hoorn Study. MetS was defined according to the NCEP (National Cholesterol Education Program) criteria. Arterial stiffness was determined by ultrasound, tonometry and echocardiography. Inflammation, ED and IR were estimated by C-reactive protein, flow-mediated vasodilation and the homoeostatic model for the assessment of IR, respectively. The results showed that MetS was associated with both femoral and brachial arterial stiffness, significantly so for the distensibility coefficients and for the femoral compliance coefficient. In the carotid artery and aorta, no particular pattern emerged. Additional adjustment for either inflammation, ED or IR did not materially alter the results. The results therefore indicate that muscular arteries may stiffen preferentially over elastic arteries and that distensibility is affected to a greater extent than compliance, thus maintaining volume compliance over vessel wall stiffening. Additionally, the increase in stiffness was not explained by inflammation, ED or IR and suggests that stiffening of the muscular arteries in MetS may not be the consequence of these phenomena.
ISSN:0950-9240
1476-5527
DOI:10.1038/jhh.2009.8