Mechanical Properties of Type 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel Coated with Titanium Nitride after Ion-Nitriding

Austenitic type 304 stainless steel was ion-nitrided at 823∼853K, using a N2–H2 d.c. glow discharge plasma. After ion-nitriding, the top thin compound layer mainly composed of γ′-Fe4N was removed by emery paper. A thin layer of Ti with a thickness of 0.1 μm was deposited on this nitrided specimen an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMaterials Transactions, JIM Vol. 34; no. 8; pp. 696 - 702
Main Authors Yasumaru, Naoki, Tsuchida, Kouzou, Saji, Eiji, Ibe, Toshio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Sendai The Japan Institute of Metals 1993
Japan Institute of Metals
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Austenitic type 304 stainless steel was ion-nitrided at 823∼853K, using a N2–H2 d.c. glow discharge plasma. After ion-nitriding, the top thin compound layer mainly composed of γ′-Fe4N was removed by emery paper. A thin layer of Ti with a thickness of 0.1 μm was deposited on this nitrided specimen and, subsequently, TiN of 1.7 μm was deposited at about 623 K, using an ion-plating technique. By this combined treatment of ion-nitriding and subsequent ion-plating, surface hardened layers were formed, which were composed of (i) a thin outermost coating layer of TiN with the hardness of about Hv 2200 and (ii) a thick inner diffusion layer of about Hv 1100. The mechanical properties of the specimens TiN-coated after ion-nitriding were examined and compared with the untreated or only ion-nitrided or only TiN-coated specimens. The duplex treated specimens showed an improved resistance to wear, the largest wear resistance among them. As for the corrosion resistance, the specimens were a little inferior to the only TiN-coated specimens, but showed an improved resistance compared with the untreated specimens. The fatigue limit of the specimens was lowered slightly compared with the only ion-nitrided specimens, but showed a considerable improvement compared with the untreated specimens.
ISSN:0916-1821
2432-471X
DOI:10.2320/matertrans1989.34.696