Misdiagnosis of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome and Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome in the Emergency Department

• Published in: Journal of the American Heart Association Vol. 12; no. 19; p. e030009
• Main Authors: Liberman, Ava L, Zhang, Cenai, Parikh, Neal S, Salehi Omran, Setareh, Navi, Babak B, Lappin, Richard I, Merkler, Alexander E, Kaiser, Jed H, Kamel, Hooman
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England John Wiley and Sons Inc 03.10.2023; Wiley
• Subjects: Cerebrovascular Disorders - complications; diagnostic error; Diagnostic Errors; emergency medicine; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Original Research; Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome - complications; Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome - diagnosis; Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome - epidemiology; posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome; Retrospective Studies; reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome; stroke; Stroke - complications; Vasoconstriction; Vasospasm, Intracranial - complications; posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome; diagnostic error; emergency medicine; reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome; stroke
• ISSN: 2047-9980; 2047-9980
• DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030009

Background Cerebrovascular dysregulation syndromes, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS), are challenging to diagnose because they are rare and require advanced neuroimaging for confirmation. We sought to estimate PRES/RCVS misdiagnosis in the emergency department and its associated factors. Methods and Results We conducted a retrospective cohort study of PRES/RCVS patients using administrative claims data from 11 states (2016-2018). We defined patients with a probable PRES/RCVS misdiagnosis as those with an emergency department visit for a neurological symptom resulting in discharge to home that occurred ≤14 days before PRES/RCVS hospitalization. Proportions of patients with probable misdiagnosis were calculated, characteristics of patients with and without probable misdiagnosis were compared, and regression analyses adjusted for demographics and comorbidities were performed to identify factors affecting probable misdiagnosis. We identified 4633 patients with PRES/RCVS. A total of 210 patients (4.53% [95% CI, 3.97-5.17]) had a probable preceding emergency department misdiagnosis; these patients were younger (mean age, 48 versus 54 years; <0.001) and more often female (80.4% versus 69.3%; <0.001). Misdiagnosed patients had fewer vascular risk factors except prior stroke (36.3% versus 24.2%; <0.001) and more often had comorbid headache (84% versus 21.4%; <0.001) and substance use disorder (48.8% versus 37.9%; <0.001). Facility-level factors associated with probable misdiagnosis included smaller facility, lacking a residency program (62.2% versus 73.7%; <0.001), and not having on-site neurological services (75.7% versus 84.3%; <0.001). Probable misdiagnosis was not associated with higher likelihood of stroke or subarachnoid hemorrhage during PRES/RCVS hospitalization. Conclusions Probable emergency department misdiagnosis occurred in ≈1 of every 20 patients with PRES/RCVS in a large, multistate cohort.