Impact of socio-demographic, socioeconomic, and water variables on dental fluorosis in adolescents growing up during the implementation of a fluoridated domestic salt program

• Published in: Odontology Vol. 102; no. 1; pp. 105 - 115
• Main Authors: America P.Pontigo-Loyola, Carlo E.Medina-Solis, Edith Lara-Carrillo, Nuria Patino-Marin, Mauricio Escoffie-Ramirez, Martha Mendoza-Rodriguez, Ruben De La Rosa-Santillana, Gerardo Maupome
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Tokyo The Society of the Nippon Dental University 01.01.2014; Springer Japan; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adolescent; Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Demographics; Dental care; Dentistry; Drinking Water; Female; Fluoridation; Fluorides - administration & dosage; Fluorides - adverse effects; Fluorosis, Dental - etiology; Humans; Male; Medicine; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery; Original Article; Salt; Socioeconomic Factors; Water; Mexico; Socioeconomic status; Adolescents; Oral health; Dental fluorosis
• ISSN: 1618-1247; 1618-1255
• DOI: 10.1007/s10266-012-0094-x

[Abstract] The objective of this study is to determine the impact of socio-demographic, socioeconomic, and other risk indicators on dental fluorosis (DF) among Mexican adolescents. A cross-sectional study was carried out in 1,538 adolescents 12 and 15 years of age in semi-rural communities located at high altitude (>2,000m) and with high concentration of fluoride in water (1.38-3.07ppm) in Hidalgo, Mexico. DF was determined by means of Dean's Index and all teeth were examined. Remaining variables were collected using a questionnaire. The adjusted final model was performed using ordered logistic regression. After adjusting for sex, the variables associated with DF were (p<0.05): being 12 years old (OR=1.10) versus 15 years old; having lived the first 6 years of life in El Llano (3.07 F ppm) (OR=3.19) or San Marcos (1.38 F ppm) (OR=1.63) versus Tula (1.42 F ppm); having public (OR=1.35) or private health insurance (OR=1.36) versus those without insurance; belonging to the lower quartiles of socioeconomic position (SEP) [1st quartile (OR=2.48), 2nd quartile (OR=1.81), 3rd quartile (OR=1.49)] versus the highest quartile; having drunk tap water (OR=1.83) or from a well or spring (OR=2.30) versus those who drank water purchased in large containers or bottles. Demographic and socioeconomic variables were associated with DF. While better SEP appeared to play an important role in DF, a pattern of water intake associated with water purchased in large containers or bottles (which have different connotations to the use of bottled water in industrialized Western countries) did reduce DF risk in these high fluoride content, high altitude communities.