Visual assessment of the Australian Land Erodibility Model

There is a growing requirement for techniques to assess land susceptibility to wind erosion, i.e. land erodibility, over large geographic areas (>10 4 km 2). This requirement stems from a lack of wind erosion research between the field (10 1 km 2) and regional scales, and a need to evaluate the p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of arid environments Vol. 73; no. 6; pp. 678 - 682
Main Authors Webb, N.P., Phinn, S.R., McGowan, H.A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2009
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There is a growing requirement for techniques to assess land susceptibility to wind erosion, i.e. land erodibility, over large geographic areas (>10 4 km 2). This requirement stems from a lack of wind erosion research between the field (10 1 km 2) and regional scales, and a need to evaluate the performance of spatially explicit wind erosion models across these scales. This paper addresses this issue by presenting a methodology for monitoring land erodibility at the landscape scale (10 3 km 2). First, we define criteria suitable for evaluating land erodibility based on empirical relationships between soil texture, vegetation cover, geomorphology, and wind erosion. The criteria were used to visually assess land erodibility over long distances (10 3 km) using vehicle-based transects run through the rangelands of western Queensland, Australia. Application of the data for testing the performance of a spatially explicit land erodibility model (AUSLEM) is then demonstrated by comparing the visual assessments of land erodibility with the model output. The model performed best in the west of the study area in the open rangelands. In regions with higher woody shrub and tree cover the model performance decreases. This highlights the need for research to better parameterise controls on erodibility in semi-arid landscapes consisting of forested and rangeland mosaics.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.01.014
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0140-1963
1095-922X
DOI:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.01.014