Host feeding in insect parasitoids: why destructively feed upon a host that excretes an alternative?

• Published in: Entomologia experimentalis et applicata Vol. 112; no. 3; pp. 207 - 215
• Main Authors: Burger, Joep M.S., Reijnen, Tamar M., Van Lenteren, Joop C., Vet, Louise E.M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing, Ltd 01.09.2004; Blackwell
• Subjects: Aleyrodidae; alfalfa weevil coleoptera; anhydropic eggs; Aphelinidae; aphytis-melinus; Biological and medical sciences; Biological control; Control; Encarsia formosa; encarsia-formosa hymenoptera; evolutionary; fecundity; food; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Homoptera; honeydew; honeydew sugars; host-feeding behaviour; Hymenoptera; life history; longevity; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection; Protozoa. Invertebrates; strategies; Trialeurodes vaporariorum; trialeurodes-vaporariorum homoptera; Host parasite relation; Insecta; Biological control; host-feeding behaviour; Pest; Entomophagous; Homoptera; Beneficial animal; Chalcidoidea; Development; Life history; Feeding behavior; Egg; Trialeurodes vaporariorum; Aphelinidae; Host; Longevity; anhydropic eggs; Parasitoid; Encarsia formosa; Arthropoda; Aleyrodidae; Hymenoptera; Invertebrata; Fecundity; Honeydew
• ISSN: 0013-8703; 1570-7458; 1570-8703
• DOI: 10.1111/j.0013-8703.2004.00196.x

Host feeding is the consumption of host tissue by the adult female parasitoid. We studied the function of destructive host feeding and its advantage over non‐destructive feeding on host‐derived honeydew in the whitefly parasitoid Encarsia formosa Gahan (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). We allowed parasitoids to oviposit until they attempted to host feed. We either prevented or allowed host feeding. Parasitoids had access to sucrose solution, with or without additional access to honeydew. Parasitoids that were allowed to host feed did not have a higher egg load 20 or 48 h after host feeding than parasitoids prevented from host feeding. Host feeding did not increase the number of eggs matured within these periods, nor did the time spent host feeding positively affect any of these response variables. On the other hand, the presence of honeydew did have a positive effect on egg load 20 and 48 h after host feeding compared with parasitoids deprived of honeydew. Parasitoids with access to honeydew matured more eggs within these periods than honeydew‐deprived parasitoids. Host feeding increased life expectancy, but this effect was nullified when honeydew was supplied after the host‐feeding attempt. In conclusion, feeding on honeydew could be an advantageous alternative to host feeding in terms of egg quantity and longevity. This applies especially to parasitoids exploiting Homoptera, because these parasitoids can obtain honeydew from the host itself. It is possible that destructive host feeding has evolved to enable females to sustain the production of high‐quality anhydropic eggs, which may be important in the parasitoid's natural environment. We argue that future studies should take natural alternative food sources into more consideration.