Elevation of Preprocedural Systemic Immune Inflammation Level Increases the Risk of Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Following Coronary Angiography: A Multicenter Cohort Study
Inflammation and immune responses play an important role in the pathophysiology of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI), and systemic immune inflammation index (SII) has recently emerged as a new parameter for immune and inflammatory response evaluation. However, limited research has bee...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of inflammation research Vol. 15; pp. 2959 - 2969 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New Zealand
Dove Medical Press Limited
31.05.2022
Dove Dove Medical Press |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Inflammation and immune responses play an important role in the pathophysiology of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI), and systemic immune inflammation index (SII) has recently emerged as a new parameter for immune and inflammatory response evaluation. However, limited research has been undertaken to explore the relationship between SII and CA-AKI following coronary angiography (CAG).
From January 2007 to December 2020, 46,333 patients undergoing CAG were included from 5 Chinese tertiary hospitals. SII was calculated as total peripheral platelets count × neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Patients were categorized by preprocedural SII quartiles: Q1 ≤404.5, Q2 >404.5 and ≤631.7, Q3 >631.7 and ≤1082.8, Q4 >1082.8. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to reveal the link between preprocedural SII and CA-AKI.
A total of the 46,333 patients (62.9 ± 11.5 years, female 28.1%) were included in the study. The incidence of CA-AKI was 8.4% in Q1 group, 8.7% in Q2 group, 9.4% in Q3 group, 15.1% in Q4 group. In the multivariable model, comparing the highest (Q4 group) to lowest (Q1 group) SII level categories, preprocedural SII was related to a higher risk of CA-AKI after fully adjusting for well-known confounders, and there was no statistically difference in the other two SII level categories (Q2 and Q3 groups) compared with Q1 group (adjusted model 3: Q2 group: OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.87-1.11, P = 0.771; Q3 group: OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.92-1.18, P = 0.553; Q4: OR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.45-1.88, p < 0.001; P for trend < 0.001). Similar results were found for all the subgroups analysis except for patients undergoing PCI, and the interaction analyses for age, PCI and AMI were significant. In addition, Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that the lowest quartile group showed the worst all-cause mortality in a significant SII level-dependent manner among the four groups (Log rank test; p < 0.0001).
Elevated preprocedural SII level was a significant and independent risk factor for CA-AKI following CAG. Higher-quality prospective studies are needed to validate the predictive value of SII for CA-AKI. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 These authors contributed equally to this work |
ISSN: | 1178-7031 1178-7031 |
DOI: | 10.2147/JIR.S364915 |