Tablet use in schools: a critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes

The increased popularity of tablets in general has led to uptake in education. We critically review the literature reporting use of tablets by primary and secondary school children across the curriculum, with a particular emphasis on learning outcomes. The systematic review methodology was used, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of computer assisted learning Vol. 32; no. 2; pp. 139 - 156
Main Authors Haßler, B., Major, L., Hennessy, S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2016
Wiley-Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The increased popularity of tablets in general has led to uptake in education. We critically review the literature reporting use of tablets by primary and secondary school children across the curriculum, with a particular emphasis on learning outcomes. The systematic review methodology was used, and our literature search resulted in 33 relevant studies meeting the inclusion criteria. A total of 23 met the minimum quality criteria and were examined in detail (16 reporting positive learning outcomes, 5 no difference and 2 negative learning outcomes). Explanations underlying these observations were analysed, and factors contributing to successful uses of tablets are discussed. While we hypothesize how tablets can viably support children in completing a variety of learning tasks (across a range of contexts and academic subjects), the fragmented nature of the current knowledge base, and the scarcity of rigorous studies, makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions. The generalizability of evidence is limited, and detailed explanations as to how, or why, using tablets within certain activities can improve learning remain elusive. We recommend that future research moves beyond exploration towards systematic and in‐depth investigations building on the existing findings documented here.
Bibliography:Supporting Document 1: Quality Appraisal - Weight of Evidence ChecklistSupporting Document 2: Learning Gains: Not DiscussedSupporting Document 3: Data Extraction Spreadsheet
ArticleID:JCAL12123
istex:54C281527B9D15DEE6800477DC9942AD10719442
ark:/67375/WNG-BD895PWL-4
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0266-4909
1365-2729
DOI:10.1111/jcal.12123