Changes in pulmonary function following thoracic spine manipulation in a healthy inactive older adult population—a pilot study

[Purpose] Pulmonary function pathology is primarily treated pharmacologically, with a range of medication side effects. Few studies have systematically examined non-pharmacologic approaches such as joint manipulation effects on pulmonary function. This study examined the immediate and short-term eff...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Physical Therapy Science Vol. 35; no. 7; pp. 492 - 496
Main Authors Jonely, Holly, Jayaseelan, Dhinu, Costello, Ellen, Signorino, Joseph, Wooten, Liana, Murray, Donal, Woolstenhulme, Josh
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Japanese
Published Japan The Society of Physical Therapy Science 01.01.2023
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[Purpose] Pulmonary function pathology is primarily treated pharmacologically, with a range of medication side effects. Few studies have systematically examined non-pharmacologic approaches such as joint manipulation effects on pulmonary function. This study examined the immediate and short-term effects of thoracic manipulation on pulmonary function. [Participants and Methods] Twenty-one physically inactive otherwise healthy participants aged 50 years or older were randomly assigned to either receive three sessions of thoracic manipulation (n=10) or three sessions of “sham intercostal training” (n=11). Outcome measures included forced vital capacity, maximal voluntary ventilation and thoracic excursion during maximal inhalation and exhalation. [Results] There was a statistically significant difference in maximal voluntary ventilation in the manipulation group, when measured within a week of the third intervention session and immediate effects in thoracic excursion during exhalation in the sham group following a single intervention session. There were no significant changes in other measures. [Conclusion] Spinal manipulation had no immediate effect on pulmonary function, however, affected an improvement in maximal voluntary ventilation within 7 days following a third session. The sham intervention showed a change in thoracic excursion during exhalation after the first session. Future research is necessary to further explore the relationship between thoracic manipulation and pulmonary function.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0915-5287
2187-5626
DOI:10.1589/jpts.35.492