Comparison of two surgical approaches for treating vitiligo: a preliminary study

Background Surgical techniques have recently been introduced for patients with vitiligo. Randomized controlled trials have not been performed. Aim To compare the efficacy and side‐effects of two surgical methods (suction blister vs. thin split‐thickness graft technique) for the treatment of vitiligo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of dermatology Vol. 41; no. 3; pp. 135 - 138
Main Authors Özdemir, Mustafa, Çetinkale, Oğuz, Wolf, Ronni, Kotoğyan, Agop, Mat, Cem, Tüzün, Binnur, Tüzün, Yalçın
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.03.2002
Blackwell Science
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Surgical techniques have recently been introduced for patients with vitiligo. Randomized controlled trials have not been performed. Aim To compare the efficacy and side‐effects of two surgical methods (suction blister vs. thin split‐thickness graft technique) for the treatment of vitiligo. Methods Three suction blisters, approximately 0.8 cm in diameter, made with a special tool attached to a vacuum extractor, which were converted to erosions by removal of the roofs of the bullae, and one round erosion of approximately the same diameter, made using a silver knife, were created. One roof of a blister and two cutaneous thin split‐thickness grafts taken from the gluteal region were transferred onto recipient vitiliginous areas; one was left alone. The results were evaluated by one non‐blind and two blind observers bimonthly during the 3‐month follow‐up period. Results Repigmentation rates were 25–65% in the suction blister technique and 90% in the thin split‐thickness graft technique (P < 0.001). Conclusions The thin split‐thickness graft technique is superior to the suction blister technique in treating vitiligo.
Bibliography:istex:4D820EE5AF715CBE67357A1814348F12247CEC7D
ark:/67375/WNG-1F0QTC0Q-N
ArticleID:IJD1391
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0011-9059
1365-4632
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-4362.2002.01391.x