Protein oxidation in the intermembrane space of mitochondria is substrate-specific rather than general

In most cellular compartments cysteine residues are predominantly reduced. However, in the bacterial periplasm, the ER and the mitochondrial intermembrane space (IMS), sulfhydryl oxidases catalyze the formation of disulfide bonds. Nevertheless, many IMS proteins contain reduced cysteines that partic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMicrobial cell Vol. 1; no. 3; pp. 81 - 93
Main Authors Peleh, Valentina, Riemer, Jan, Dancis, Andrew, Herrmann, Johannes M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Austria Shared Science Publishers OG 03.03.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In most cellular compartments cysteine residues are predominantly reduced. However, in the bacterial periplasm, the ER and the mitochondrial intermembrane space (IMS), sulfhydryl oxidases catalyze the formation of disulfide bonds. Nevertheless, many IMS proteins contain reduced cysteines that participate in binding metal- or heme-cofactors. In this study, we addressed the substrate specificity of the mitochondrial protein oxidation machinery. Dre2 is a cysteine-rich protein that is located in the cytosol. A large fraction of Dre2 bound to the cytosolic side of the outer membrane of mitochondria. Even when Dre2 is artificially targeted to the IMS, its cysteine residues remain in the reduced state. This indicates that protein oxidation in the IMS of mitochondria is not a consequence of the apparent oxidizing environment in this compartment but rather is substrate-specific and determined by the presence of Mia40-binding sites.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Please cite this article as: Valentina Peleh, Jan Riemer, Andrew Dancis and Johannes M. Herrmann (2014). Protein oxidation in the intermembrane space of mitochondria is substrate-specific rather than general. Microbial Cell 1(3): 81-93. doi: 10.15698/mic2014.01.130
Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
ISSN:2311-2638
2311-2638
DOI:10.15698/mic2014.01.130