Sensory MEG Responses Predict Successful and Failed Inhibition in a Stop-Signal Task

In the present study magnetoencephalographic recordings were performed to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying the stopping of manual responses. Subjects performed in a Stop-signal task in which Go-stimuli (S1), requiring a rapid motor response, were sometimes rapidly followed by a Stop-stim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991) Vol. 19; no. 1; pp. 134 - 145
Main Authors Boehler, C. N., Münte, T. F., Krebs, R. M., Heinze, H. -J., Schoenfeld, M. A., Hopf, J. -M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Oxford University Press 01.01.2009
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In the present study magnetoencephalographic recordings were performed to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying the stopping of manual responses. Subjects performed in a Stop-signal task in which Go-stimuli (S1), requiring a rapid motor response, were sometimes rapidly followed by a Stop-stimulus (S2) indicating to withhold the already initiated response to S1. Success of stopping strongly depended on the early perceptual processing of S1 and S2 reflected by the magnetic N1 component. Enhanced processing of S1 facilitated the execution of the movement, whereas enhanced processing of S2 favored its inhibition. This suggests that the processing resources for the subsequent stimuli are limited and need to be shared. This sharing of resources appeared to arise from adjustments made on a trial-by-trial basis, in that systematic reaction time prolongations on Go-trials following Stop-trials versus following Go-trials were accompanied by attenuated sensory processing to the Go-stimulus similar to that seen in successful versus unsuccessful stopping in Stop-trials.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/HXZ-9022SNXT-9
istex:6227F5E5581482E085124E354C71FCA3E2B70503
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1047-3211
1460-2199
DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhn063