An inbreeding model of associative overdominance during a population bottleneck

• Published in: Genetics (Austin) Vol. 155; no. 4; pp. 1981 - 1990
• Main Authors: Bierne, N, Tsitrone, A, David, P
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Genetics Society of America 01.08.2000
• Subjects: Animals; Genetic Linkage; Genetics, Population; Genomics; Inbreeding; linkage disequilibrium; Models, Genetic; Models, Statistical; Mutation; overdominance; Population; Population Density; Software; Time Factors
• ISSN: 0016-6731; 1943-2631; 1943-2631
• DOI: 10.1093/genetics/155.4.1981

Associative overdominance, the fitness difference between heterozygotes and homozygotes at a neutral locus, is classically described using two categories of models: linkage disequilibrium in small populations or identity disequilibrium in infinite, partially selfing populations. In both cases, only equilibrium situations have been considered. In the present study, associative overdominance is related to the distribution of individual inbreeding levels (i.e., genomic autozygosity). Our model integrates the effects of physical linkage and variation in inbreeding history among individual pedigrees. Hence, linkage and identity disequilibrium, traditionally presented as alternatives, are summarized within a single framework. This allows studying nonequilibrium situations in which both occur simultaneously. The model is applied to the case of an infinite population undergoing a sustained population bottleneck. The effects of bottleneck size, mating system, marker gene diversity, deleterious genomic mutation parameters, and physical linkage are evaluated. Bottlenecks transiently generate much larger associative overdominance than observed in equilibrium finite populations and represent a plausible explanation of empirical results obtained, for instance, in marine species. Moreover, the main origin of associative overdominance is random variation in individual inbreeding whereas physical linkage has little effect.